Bridging Legal Cultures: How Hong Kong Mediators Are Shaping the Greater Bay Area’s Cross-Border Dispute Resolution
This article contains AI assisted creative content
In the rapidly evolving business landscape of the Greater Bay Area (GBA), a quiet but significant transformation is taking place in the way cross-border commercial disputes are resolved. At the heart of this shift is a pioneering initiative by the Qianhai Cooperation Zone People's Court in Shenzhen, which in June 2024 became one of China's first courts to integrate Hong Kong-based mediation organizations into its judicial practice.
Over the past year, three specialized Hong Kong mediation institutions—the Hong Kong Mediation Council, the Hong Kong Mediation Centre, and the Mainland-Hong Kong Joint Mediation Centre—have played a central role in blending distinct legal cultures into a hybrid model of dispute resolution. By June 2025, these organizations had handled 300 cases, closed 285, and successfully mediated 126, achieving a 44.21% success rate—an improvement of 17.71 percentage points over the prior performance of individual Hong Kong mediators in similar contexts.
A Case That Illustrates the GBA Approach
Consider the experience of Hong Kong mediator Ning Xiuping, who resolved a five-year commercial dispute between a South American company and a Shenzhen mold manufacturer. The parties had signed a $100,000 mold contract, but soaring shipping costs during execution triggered a disagreement over payment responsibilities, eventually leading to litigation.
Ning began with facilitative mediation, encouraging the parties to explore settlement frameworks that would allow the contract to continue. When negotiations stalled over the allocation of shipping costs, she shifted to evaluative mediation, providing a neutral analysis grounded in international trade trends and urging the parties to consider their long-term business relationship. Her advice—“commercial partners must weather storms together”—proved decisive. Both sides agreed to a mediated settlement, which the court formalized, closing a dispute that had lingered for half a decade.
Crafting an “Innovation Sample” for Cross-Border Mediation
TWO
This hybrid approach, often summarized as “facilitation first, evaluation as needed,” reflects the distinctive mediation culture emerging in the GBA. According to Ma Zhasu, Vice Chair of the Hong Kong Mediation Council and a long-time mediator, this model blends the humanistic ethos of Chinese “harmony” with the structured professional methods of international mediation.
Facilitative mediation builds trust and encourages parties to propose their own solutions.
Evaluative mediation introduces legal and commercial perspectives to break deadlocks, particularly in cross-border cases where legal frameworks diverge.
Such integration is particularly appealing for multinational companies and investors. It provides a predictable, culturally sensitive, and efficient path for resolving disputes in a region that hosts increasing volumes of cross-border trade and investment.
THREE
Mediator Yang Shiwen describes the GBA's approach as a “triple empowerment” model:
-
Technology – Qianhai Court has established a one-stop, fully digital platform that guides parties from the initial filing to mediation and resolution, boosting speed and transparency.
-
International Standards – The participation of Hong Kong mediators introduces globally recognized best practices, helping foreign businesses navigate disputes without fearing “home-court bias.”
-
Cultural Harmony – The traditional Chinese principle of “he wei gui” (harmony as a virtue) serves as an emotional bridge, fostering trust even in high-stakes commercial conflicts.
The fusion of these elements transforms traditional mediation from an experience-driven practice into a systematized, replicable mechanism that suits modern business needs. It also lowers litigation risk and protects long-term commercial relationships, a priority for foreign investors evaluating the GBA's fast-expanding market.
First, please LoginComment After ~