Legal Trends in the Private Equity Fund Industry (September 2025/Issue 91)
Legal Service Trends of State owned
Assets and Funds Research Center
01
Yang Chunbao's legal team has been hired as the permanent legal advisor for Shanghai Jinpu Innovation Equity Investment Management Co., Ltd. Jinpu Innovation is a well-known private equity fund manager under Jinpu Investment, with a managed fund size of over 6 billion yuan. Its main investment areas are semiconductors, healthcare, information technology, and new energy.
02
The lawyer team led by Yang Chunbao has been commissioned by a Pudong industrial development fund to provide full legal services related to its proposed participation in the establishment of S Fund, including conducting legal due diligence and issuing due diligence reports, reviewing and modifying the fund partnership agreement, drafting ancillary agreements to the fund partnership agreement, etc.
03
The arbitration case filed by a private equity fund investor represented by Yang Chunbao's legal team against the fund manager at the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court has recently been ruled out, and the investor has successfully obtained compensation.
04
The equity repurchase dispute between a private equity fund represented by Yang Chunbao's legal team and the founding shareholders of the invested company was heard in Xuhui Court.
05
Lawyer Yang Chunbao has been appointed as an arbitrator of Nantong Arbitration Commission.
Various announcements and notices of the association
Disciplinary action taken by the association
Legal, regulatory, and judicial developments
Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Company Law
of the People's Republic of China (Draft for Soliciting Opinions)
On September 30, 2025, the Supreme People's Court released the "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China (Draft for Comments)" (hereinafter referred to as the "Judicial Interpretation Draft of the Company Law") for public consultation. The Draft Judicial Interpretation of the Company Law consists of eight chapters and ninety articles, including general provisions (11 articles), shareholder contributions and responsibilities related to contributions (19 articles), equity proxy and investor rights protection (9 articles), equity transfer and pre emptive rights (9 articles), corporate governance (11 articles), company dissolution and liquidation (18 articles), special provisions for listed companies (10 articles), and supplementary provisions (3 articles).
It is worth noting for practitioners in the private equity investment fund industry that this draft of the Judicial Interpretation of the Company Law has added provisions regarding the effectiveness and performance of valuation adjustment agreements (Article 37 [1]) and the determination of the nature of investors' requests for shareholders to repurchase equity (Article 38 [2]).
(1) Article 37 has absorbed the relevant content of the "Minutes of the National Conference on Civil and Commercial Trial Work of Courts" regarding the effectiveness and performance of the "betting agreement", and explicitly prohibits investors from forcing the company to actually assume the betting obligation by agreeing with the company on breach of contract liability and providing collateral, without fulfilling the capital reduction procedure or distributing profits in accordance with the law.
(2) Article 38 provides specific provisions on the rules for investors to request shareholders to repurchase their shares according to the agreement after acquiring the equity: the company shall act as a third party in the repurchase lawsuit and its corresponding registration obligations for changes; If the assets of shareholders are insufficient to pay for the repurchase, investors have the right to apply for auction or sale of equity and receive compensation from the proceeds; Before shareholders fulfill their repurchase obligations, they still need to bear the responsibility for not fully fulfilling their capital contribution obligations; In terms of exercise period, for the exercise period of selective repurchase, the previous Q&A opinion on the exercise period not exceeding 6 months in the absence of an agreement was not extended. Instead, the company's shareholders were given the right to urge, stipulating that investors should make a choice within a reasonable period after being urged by shareholders. Otherwise, their requests for equity repurchase rights will not be supported, except with the consent of shareholders; For agreements that require shareholders to repurchase their shares by the deadline, otherwise the equity will belong to the investor or the investor will repay the repurchase amount with the proceeds from the discount, auction, or sale of the equity, they shall be handled in accordance with the rules of equity transfer guarantee, except for the actual exercise of shareholder rights by the investor.
Shanghai Municipal Government Investment Fund Management Measures (Trial) Released
On September 25, 2025, the General Office of the Shanghai Municipal People's Government issued the "Shanghai Municipal Government Investment Fund Management Measures (Trial)" (hereinafter referred to as the "Measures"). The Measures consist of seven chapters and forty-four articles, including the establishment, management, exit, budget management, performance supervision, and risk prevention of government investment funds. In terms of fund establishment, the Measures stipulate the overall layout and hierarchical management of government investment funds, pre establishment evaluation and scheme refinement, as well as the establishment time, duration, and filing requirements; In terms of fund management, the Measures stipulate the organizational structure and nested hierarchical control of government investment funds, relevant requirements for fund managers, and considerations for adjusting management fees; In terms of fund exit, the Measures stipulate that fund managers should establish a fund exit management system and formulate exit plans, and clarify that government investment funds generally do not have revolving investments; In terms of budget management, the processes of budget preparation, approval, and disbursement for government investment funds have been clarified; In terms of monitoring performance and risk prevention and control, the "Measures" clearly stipulate the implementation of full process performance management for government investment funds, stipulate that the state-owned assets department shall take the lead in formulating the relevant system of due diligence exemption for government investment funds, do not use single projects or annual profits and losses as the basis for accountability, and strictly prohibit disguised borrowing in the name of government investment funds.
The association releases the third and fourth issues of private fund registration and filing updates
On September 30, 2025, the association released the third and fourth issues of private fund registration and filing dynamics, respectively summarizing the professional experience recognition of the controlling shareholder and actual controller of the manager, as well as typical problems such as the manager's disguised channel business, the manager's need for sustained business development ability, investors' lack of capital contribution ability, the manager's violation of serving as a limited partner or the fund's violation of serving as a general partner, forming cases and supporting analysis explanations:
(1) In the third dynamic case, the controlling shareholder A company (established in 2023) of the applying institution A was established by a certain group to implement the strategic deployment of promoting industrial development through funds. It collected all the equity of asset management and investment companies within the group, and undertook the responsibilities of strategic emerging industry investment layout around the group's main business; The actual controller of Company B (established in 2022) has inherited the assets, business, and personnel of Company C and Company D. The actual controller of Company C (established in 2024) has inherited the financial investment and related personnel of its own large industrial group. The relevant business lines and personnel have many years of experience in operation, management, or asset management, investment, and related industries. The association has approved the registration of managers for companies A, B, and C.
According to the Regulations on the Registration and Filing of Private Investment Funds, the controlling shareholder, actual controller, and general partner of a private fund manager must have at least 5 years of relevant experience in operating, managing, or engaging in asset management, investment, related industries, etc. The association has refined the applicable standards for the aforementioned regulations: firstly, for enterprises controlled by the government and its authorized institutions that serve as controlling shareholders, actual controllers, and general partners of private fund managers and are established to undertake major national or regional strategic functions, the association, in the spirit of serving the implementation of national strategies and promoting industry development, recognizes their relevant experience after providing relevant approval documents or proof materials. Secondly, for enterprises controlled by the government and its authorized institutions that serve as controlling shareholders, actual controllers, and general partners of private fund managers, as well as large private enterprises that are subject to mergers, divisions, restructuring, etc., the association shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China and the principle of substance over form, recognize their relevant experience after providing relevant approval documents or proof materials. For controlling shareholders, actual controllers, and general partners of private fund managers who have been established for less than 5 years due to undertaking major national or regional strategic functions, or due to mergers, divisions, restructuring, etc., the association will retrospectively recognize relevant experience based on their actual management experience, undertaking strategic functions, etc., in accordance with the principle of substance over form.
(2) In the fourth round of dynamic cases, regarding the issue of managers engaging in channel business in a disguised manner, the responsibilities of the manager and executive partner of the fund to be filed in case one are unclear and the fee collection is unreasonable. Although the manager of the fund to be filed in case two is the largest shareholder of the executive partner, their shareholding ratio is not more than 50%, and they do not enjoy absolute control, resulting in a weak control relationship. Therefore, the association has returned the fund filing applications related to the two aforementioned cases. ② Regarding the issue of the need for managers to have the ability to continue operating, Manager A and Manager B of the two funds proposed for filing in Case Three announced by the association are both institutions that have been registered earlier, have a smaller scale of management, and have not been operating for a long time. To verify whether the managers continue to meet the registration requirements, the association requires them to provide all employee resumes, labor contracts, social security payment records and salary statements in the past six months, company account bank statements in the past year, and other materials. After investigation, Manager A has not paid social security to the employees, and has less than 5 full-time employees who do not have the ability to sustain their business. The association requires them to rectify within a specified period of time, and subsequently handle fund filing based on the rectification situation. Manager B has a good financial condition, with no less than 5 full-time employees, meeting the basic business requirements. They plan to file for private fund registration and have fully paid in the funds. The first proposed bidder has been identified, and there is a genuine need for business expansion. The association has processed the application for private fund registration normally. ③ Regarding the issue of investors not having the ability to contribute capital, in case four of a proposed filing fund by the association, investor B and investor C companies have a mismatch between their actual capital contribution ability and subscribed capital scale. Investor B company is reflected as an institutional investor with insufficient capital contribution ability and relies on its shareholders for capital injection. However, based on the principle of legal person property independence, shareholders have already paid up the registered capital in full and have no legal obligation to contribute to its investment fund; Investor C's company is reflected in the insufficient investment ability of institutional investors themselves, who use contingent income instead of realized income or immediately realizable assets as proof of investment ability, and cannot be recognized as having subsequent investment ability. The association shall return the filing application of the fund in accordance with relevant regulations and require the fund manager to continue to provide additional proof of investors' ability to contribute. If unable to provide such proof, the manager shall rectify the situation, determine a reasonable size of the private fund, and submit the filing application only after the investors have sufficient ability to contribute. ④ Regarding the issue of managers acting as limited partners or private equity funds acting as general partners in violation of regulations, in Case 5 announced by the association, the general partner of the proposed filing fund is another private equity fund managed by Manager D, and one of the limited partners is Manager D. This does not comply with the requirements of private equity fund managers not to directly or indirectly use private equity fund assets for investment with unlimited liability, as well as the requirements of private equity fund managers to establish partnership type private equity funds and serve as executive partners. The association has returned the fund filing application and requested the manager to adjust the fund structure.
The State Council has issued the Reply on the Pilot Implementation Plan
for Comprehensive Reform of Market oriented Allocation of Factors in Some Regions of China
On September 8, 2025, the State Council issued the "Reply on the Pilot Implementation Plan for Comprehensive Reform of Market oriented Allocation of Factors in Some Regions of China" (hereinafter referred to as the "Reply"). The "Reply" mentions supporting the construction of a comprehensive cultivation platform for planned listed enterprises in regional equity markets, cautiously exploring the transfer of private equity and venture capital shares, and strengthening cooperation and connection with the national small and medium-sized enterprise share transfer system.
The Deputy Minister of Science and Technology delivered a speech on
the Ministry of Science and Technology's guidance for venture capital to invest in
"early, small, long-term, and hard technology"
On September 18, 2025, the State Council Information Office held a series of themed press conferences on "Completing the 14th Five Year Plan with High Quality". Vice Minister of Science and Technology Qiu Yong introduced the relevant work of the Ministry of Science and Technology, mentioning the acceleration of the establishment of the National Entrepreneurship Investment Guidance Fund, which is expected to drive nearly 1 trillion yuan of local and social capital; Accelerated the deployment of a batch of financial asset investment company (AIC) funds, with a contracted amount exceeding 380 billion yuan; Jointly with the Social Security Foundation, large banks, and local governments, we will promote the establishment of technology industry integration funds, science and technology innovation collaborative parent funds, venture capital secondary market funds, etc., with a scale of over 350 billion yuan, to "attract" and "unblock" venture capital.
The Director of the Institutional Department of the
China Securities Regulatory Commission delivered a speech
on the service of private equity and venture capital funds for technological innovation
Zhao Shanzhong, Director of the Institutional Department of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, stated at the 2025 annual meeting of the Asset Management Special Committee of the Financial Street Cooperation and Development Council that private equity venture capital funds are one of the key driving forces for technological innovation. By providing key funds to support the formation of innovative capital, promoting the integration of industrial chain resources through mergers and acquisitions, and empowering enterprise growth through professional post investment management. In recent years, the China Securities Regulatory Commission has continued to deepen reforms, actively promoted the optimization of the ecology of the equity venture capital industry, worked hard to smooth the entire chain mechanism of fundraising, investment management, and withdrawal, and better played the important role of private equity venture capital funds in supporting technological innovation.
The Guangdong Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange has issued the Implementation Rules
for the Pilot Business of Foreign Exchange Management for Qualified Foreign Limited Partners (QFLP)
in the Hengqin Guangdong Macao Deep Cooperation Zone
On September 15, 2025, the Guangdong Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange issued the "Implementation Rules for the Pilot Business of Qualified Foreign Limited Partners (QFLP) Foreign Exchange Management in Hengqin Guangdong Macao Deep Cooperation Zone" (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules"). The "Detailed Rules" mainly include five aspects: foreign exchange registration, fund exchange, information reporting, and supervision and management. It is applicable to domestic enterprises recognized by local financial management departments to legally establish private investment funds in the Hengqin Guangdong Macao Deep Cooperation Zone that can raise funds from domestic and overseas investors in a non-public manner, and entrusted to manage the relevant foreign exchange management content involved in the pilot fund investment business. It specifically stipulates the foreign exchange registration procedures, QFLP pilot scale balance management, fund exchange, international balance of payments statistics declaration, etc. of management enterprises after obtaining the pilot qualification and the approved scale of overseas funds that can be raised. The detailed rules will be implemented from October 16, 2025.
The joint working meeting between the Association's Long term Fund Committee
and the Equity Investment Private Equity Fund Committee was held
On September 25, 2025, the association announced that a joint working meeting between the Long Term Fund Committee and the Equity Investment Private Equity Fund Committee had been held. During the group discussion session of the Long term Fund Committee, attending members and representatives believed that long-term funds represented by social security, insurance, banks, etc. have the characteristics of long investment periods and strong risk tolerance, which naturally complement the specialized operation and management of private equity and venture capital funds; Under the downward trend of long-term interest rates, the willingness of long-term funds to expand equity investments and increase investment returns has significantly increased, and the prospects for deep cooperation with private equity venture capital funds are broad. The attending committee members and representatives suggested actively optimizing relevant policies and unblocking checkpoints and obstacles in the key areas and difficulties of cooperation between long-term funds and private equity funds.
During the group discussion session of the parent fund committee, some members and representatives reflected that the development of government funds and market-oriented parent funds are facing new situations and challenges. There are still shortcomings and weaknesses in the function of "central local" funds, manifested in the lack of patient capital, structural imbalance of LP, further strengthening of "early investment and small investment technology", insufficient diversification of exit channels, and the need to improve tax mechanisms. These problems still exist for a long time and require sustained support policies from the state, relevant ministries, and localities to promote implementation and effectiveness. The attending committee members and representatives unanimously stated that related fields such as technology transfer, optimization of production factors, and expansion of overseas markets, as well as early investment in "early investment, small investment, hard investment" and mid to late stage investment in "strengthening chain, supplementing chain, and extending chain", will become the key focus of equity venture capital funds.
Typical Cases
1
Zhu has other contract disputes with Company B and others
【 (2024) Hu 0115 Min Chu 81854 】
Summary of the Judgment
In the case where the third party's commitment to repay the investment principal and income of investors is not based on the fund manager's repayment, the amount of the promised repayment is determined, and there is no performance comparison benchmark in the fund contract, the commitment parties constitute an independent contractual relationship rather than a general guarantee. When the relevant conditions are met, the commitment party shall make payment according to the agreement.
Main facts
In May 2020, Zhu signed a "Fund Contract" with Company A, subscribing to 2 million private equity securities investment funds managed by Company A and paying 2 million yuan in investment funds to a designated account. The case involves the provision in the Fund Contract that the fund does not set performance comparison benchmarks. In February 2022, Chen and Company B issued a "Commitment Letter" to Zhu, stating that the fund involved in the case had expired as of May 25, 2021, and the total amount of principal and income to be paid was 2.18 million yuan. Currently, due to the financial situation of the cooperating party, the payment needs to be delayed. Company B promised and guaranteed to arrange for all of Zhu's income and principal to be paid in one lump sum before December 31, 2022. If Company B did not pay, Chen voluntarily assumed the responsibility of paying all principal and income (until actual repayment). On September 9, 2022, Chen issued another "Commitment Letter" to Zhu, stating that Chen supported Zhu's redemption of the fund shares involved in the case on September 12, 2022, and that he would bear the insufficient principal and income at the time of redemption. However, neither Chen nor Company B has actually fulfilled their payment obligations under the two aforementioned 'Commitment Letters'. In March 2023, Zhu sent a "Fund Redemption Application" to Company A but was rejected. Later, he attempted to contact Chen and Company B, but both Chen and Company B were lost. He then sued and requested the court to order Chen and Company B to assume the payment obligations stated in the two "Commitment Letters". Chen argued that the nature of the "Commitment Letter" he issued was a general guarantee, and the fund manager involved in the case should first assume the redemption obligation. Zhu only sued the general guarantor, and the court should dismiss the lawsuit.
Judge's viewpoint
The court believes that regarding the nature and effectiveness of the two commitment letters involved in the case. The formal requirements of the "Commitment Letter" are complete, the content is clearly expressed, it is the true expression of intentions of Zhu, Chen, and Company B, and there is no violation of mandatory provisions of laws and regulations, it is legal and valid. According to relevant provisions of the Civil Code, in this case, Company A is not the signing party of the Commitment Letter, and the Commitment Letter does not specify the main contract and main debt; And Chen and Company B promise and guarantee to pay investment income and principal to Zhu before December 31, 2022, and their payment obligations are not subject to A Company's repayment. Although Chen's personal "Commitment Letter" mentions that he will bear the insufficient part of the redemption, it also specifies the redemption date and fixed amount in the "Commitment Letter", and since the redemption date has passed, Chen's payment obligations are not subject to A Company's performance; The amount of funds agreed upon in the two commitment letters is determined, but the fund contract involved in the case does not have a performance comparison benchmark, so the two are not identical. Therefore, the payment commitments of Chen and Company B have independence, which is different from the guarantee responsibility. Zhu has an independent contractual relationship with Chen and Company B.
Regarding whether the payment terms stipulated in the Commitment Letter have been fulfilled and the payment amount. The two 'Commitment Letters' are independent contracts, and the agreed redemption date and payment time have both expired. The payment conditions have been met, and Chen and Company B should fulfill their payment obligations. In the end, the court ruled that Chen and Company B should pay Zhu the corresponding investment principal and income based on two commitment letters.
2
C Company and Yin's execution objection lawsuit
【 (2024) Hu 0115 Min Chu 73299 】
Summary of the Judgment
The compensation received by the private fund manager on behalf of the fund through litigation, if the source of the funds is distinguishable, specific, and not mixed with the manager's inherent assets, even if it enters the manager's frozen own account, still belongs to the fund's assets, and the manager has the right to exclude the enforcement of the funds on behalf of the fund.
Main facts
In 2016, Company C, as the manager, established the first and second phases of a contract type accounts receivable private equity investment fund (hereinafter referred to as the "One Sea Phase One and Two Sea Phase Funds") to raise funds for the acquisition of accounts receivable generated by Company D's upstream internet cafe business dealings. Company D has purchased Commercial Contract Performance Guarantee Insurance from insurance company E for its accounts receivable, with Company C as the beneficiary. Later, due to D company's breach of contract, C company filed a lawsuit with the court, claiming that E company should pay insurance claims, overdue payment interest losses, and other amounts. Both the first and second trials of the case ruled in favor of C Company's relevant litigation claims. In March 2023, Company C requested in writing that Company E pay the compensation to the custody accounts of a certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II fund. However, in April 2023, Company E paid the amount in five installments to the frozen account of Company C, marked as compensation for insurance contract disputes. Yin applied for compulsory enforcement of the C company account involved in the arbitration dispute with C company after the arbitration award came into effect. The court has frozen the case involving the C company account in March 2024. After C Company's objection to execution was rejected, they filed a lawsuit requesting the court to confirm that the funds transferred by E Company to the frozen accounts in April 2023 were the property of a certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II fund, and to lift the freeze measures and cease all execution. Furthermore, it has been found that the current shareholders of certain Hai Phase I and Hai Phase II funds are Company F and Company G, and have not yet been liquidated.
Judge's viewpoint
The court believes that the focus of the dispute in this case includes: firstly, whether the disputed amount paid by a third party to the account involved in the case is the property of a certain Hai Phase I or Hai Phase II fund, and whether the legitimate civil rights and interests enjoyed by Company C as the manager of a certain Hai Phase I or Hai Phase II fund can exclude Yin's compulsory execution; Secondly, whether Company C, as the manager of a certain Hai Phase I or Hai Phase II fund, actually enjoys the equity of fund shares, and whether it has the right to claim confirmation of the ownership of the disputed funds paid by a third party to the account involved in the case with Company C.
Regarding the first point of dispute, firstly, it should be determined that Company C has civil rights sufficient to exclude compulsory enforcement in relation to the disputed funds involved, based on the determination of ownership of the funds involved. In the process of fulfilling management responsibilities, fund managers may exercise litigation rights on behalf of the interests of fund shareholders. According to the facts ascertained from the civil judgment of another case, Company C actually filed a lawsuit on behalf of the fund as the manager of a certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II fund in this case. The disputed amount that the third party should pay according to the judgment result of this case should be included in the property of the certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II fund. Secondly, the disputed funds paid by a third party to the account of Company C in April 2023 can be distinguished from the original funds frozen in the account in terms of their source nature. The third party paid the disputed insurance claims for a certain period of Hai Phase I and a certain period of Hai Phase II to the account involved in the case of Company C through bank transfer, rather than monetary cash delivery. A clear payment note was made during the transfer, and the account involved in the case of Company C had been frozen by the court at the time of transfer. The transferred funds were relatively fixed compared to the original funds, and the source of the funds could be distinguished. The transfer of funds from a third party to the account involved in the C company case is different from the performance method of delivering physical currency. Yin did not actually receive equivalent currency, nor did he actually possess, control or dispose of the above-mentioned funds, which does not comply with the principle of "currency possession is everything". Again, the fund assets are independent of the inherent assets of the fund manager and fund custodian. The payment of disputed funds by a third party to the account of Company C is a performance of the judgment obligation, and does not change the nature of the funds as assets of a certain Hai Phase I or Hai Phase II fund due to the transfer behavior. The fund assets managed by Company C as the fund manager should be distinguished from Company C's own assets. In summary, the disputed funds paid by a third party to the account involved in the C company case belong to the fund assets of certain Hai Phase I and Hai Phase II. As the fund manager of certain Hai Phase I and Hai Phase II, C company can represent the fund to exclude Yin's compulsory execution.
Regarding the second point of controversy, the current shareholders of certain Hai Phase I and Hai Phase II funds are Company F and Company G. From the perspective of the equity or partnership relationship between the parties, it cannot reflect that Company C actually controls Company F and Company G. Yin's claim that the equity of certain Hai Phase I and Hai Phase II fund shares actually belongs to Company C lacks factual basis, and the court finds it difficult to accept. As the manager of a certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II fund, Company C has the right to claim confirmation that the disputed funds paid by a third party to the account involved in the case belong to a certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II fund. Company C claims that the proportion of the disputed funds in the two funds should be determined based on the proportion of the two fund shares, as it fulfills its management responsibilities as a fund manager. The court has recognized this claim.
In summary, as the fund manager of a certain Hai Phase I and a certain Hai Phase II, Company C's lawsuit request to exclude the execution of frozen assets involved in the case and confirm its rights has factual and legal basis, and the court supports it.
[1] Article 37: Validity and Performance of Valuation Adjustment Agreements
Investors and the company or its shareholders or actual controllers enter into a valuation adjustment agreement, which stipulates that when the company fails to achieve the agreed performance or cannot achieve listing conditions within a certain period of time, the company or its shareholders or actual controllers shall repurchase equity, assume monetary compensation obligations, etc. If the parties request confirmation that the agreement is invalid, the people's court shall not support it, except as otherwise provided in this interpretation.
If the investor and the company enter into the aforementioned agreement and the company fails to perform the capital reduction procedure or distribute profits in accordance with the law, and the parties request to continue to perform, the people's court will not support it. If the party concerned requests the company to bear the liability for breach of contract or provide collateral for the company's failure to perform the capital reduction procedure or distribute profits in accordance with the law, and requests the company to bear the liability for breach of contract or guarantee in accordance with the agreement, the people's court shall not support it; If a third party provides guarantee and the investor requests the third party to assume the guarantee responsibility, the people's court shall support it.
[2] Article 38: Determination of the Nature of Investors' Request for Shareholders to Repurchase Equity
Shareholders and investors agree to transfer their equity to the investor's name, and when certain conditions are met, the shareholder will repurchase the equity. If the investor requests the shareholder to repurchase the equity after the agreed repurchase conditions are met, the people's court shall, based on the application of the parties or its authority, add the company as a third party to participate in the litigation. At the same time as the judgment that the shareholder fulfills the repurchase obligation, the judgment shall specify that after the shareholder fulfills the repurchase obligation, the company shall change the shareholder register and handle the registration of equity changes; If the assets of shareholders are insufficient to pay for the repurchase, investors have the right to apply for auction or sale of equity and receive compensation from the proceeds. If the company or its creditors request investors to bear the responsibility for not fully fulfilling their capital contribution obligations before shareholders fulfill their repurchase obligations, the people's court shall support it in accordance with the law.
Shareholders and investors agree to transfer equity to the investor's name. When certain conditions are met, the investor has the right to choose whether to request the shareholder to repurchase the equity. After the conditions are met, the investor makes a choice within the agreed period or within a reasonable period after being urged by the shareholder. If the investor requests the shareholder to repurchase the equity, the judgment statement and the shareholder's investment obligation shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph. If an investor requests shareholders to repurchase their equity after the aforementioned deadline, the people's court will not support it, except with the consent of the shareholders.
Shareholders and investors agree to transfer equity to the investor's name, and after a certain period of time expires, the shareholder shall repurchase the equity with the principal and excess price. If the equity is not repurchased at the expiration, it shall belong to the investor or be repaid by the investor with the proceeds from the discount, auction, or sale of the equity. The provisions of Article 68 and Article 69 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on the Application of the Relevant Guarantee System of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China on the Guarantee of Equity Transfer shall be handled accordingly. However, if the investor exercises shareholder rights beyond the purpose of the guarantee, it shall be handled in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of this article.







First, please LoginComment After ~